Young earth radiometric dating 2way mobile cam sex
The RATE team was chaired by Larry Vardiman (meteorology) and included Steven A. De Young (physics), Russell Humphreys (physics) and Andrew Snelling (hard rock geology).
Austin (soft rock geology), John Baumgardner (geophysics), Steven W. The project's findings were published in 2005, and while they acknowledged evidence for over 500 million years of radiometric decay at today's rates, they also claimed to have discovered other evidences that pointed to a young earth.
Carbon-14 cannot be used to date biological artifacts of organisms that did not get their carbon dioxide from the air.
This rules out carbon dating for most aquatic organisms, because they often obtain at least some of their carbon from dissolved carbonate rock.
Carbon dating is used to determine the age of biological artifacts up to 50,000 years old.
This technique is widely used on recent artifacts, but educators and students alike should note that this technique will not work on older fossils (like those of the dinosaurs alleged to be millions of years old).
They therefore hypothesised that nuclear decay rates were accelerated by a factor of approximately one billion on the first two days of the Creation week and during the Flood.
Non-affiliated experts who have scrutinised the claims have unanimously rejected them as flawed.
The question should be whether or not carbon-14 can be used to date any artifacts at all? There are a few categories of artifacts that can be dated using carbon-14; however, they cannot be more 50,000 years old.Although the time at which any individual atom will decay cannot be forecast, the time in which any given percentage of a sample will decay can be calculated to varying degrees of accuracy.The time that it takes for half of a sample to decay is known as the half life of the isotope.Both Christians and atheists are commonly guilty of this error.
It should be obvious that any Christian who believes that God is the ordainer and framer of this world, and that God is the initiator of all logic and scientific thought, should never take such a position.
Rather, the purpose of this paper is to ensure that our Faith is based firmly on Truth, and not merely wishful thinking.